Reproductive Rights at Allegheny College: A Manifesto

By Jess Durst, Marcie Langford, Maura McCarthy, and Val Schwartz

In recent months, the media have been bursting with headlines regarding issues of reproductive freedom. Debates surrounding the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act are sparking feelings of heated frustration in individuals nationwide. As women in our early twenties, who have grown up assuming that our reproductive rights were more or less assured by the accomplishments of the baby boomer generation, we are quickly realizing that the freedoms granted to us as a product of Roe vs. Wade are not written in indelible ink. It seems, in fact, that those in power in our country are trying their hardest to erase our rights, right before our eyes. Why? Because they want to pretend that the elimination of possible solutions will cause the problem to disappear altogether? Well guess what-it doesn't exactly work that way.

The setting of our case study: Allegheny College, a small, private institution of higher learning located rural northwestern Pennsylvania. While the members of our campus community may appear to be upstanding young citizens, hailing from predominantly middle-class backgrounds, striving to transform their academic aspirations into realities, one would be mistaken to conjecture that these squeaky-clean youths refrain from participating in sexual activity. Let's face it-there isn't a whole hell of a lot to do in Meadville, and sex provides not only relief from stress and boredom, but also a fun way to keep warm during the long, cold winter. Sexual exploration is natural, a part of maturing and finding oneself. To imagine that it doesn't exist, to attempt to prevent it from occurring, and/or to condemn young people for satisfying their sexual curiosities solves absolutely nothing. We are fully aware that sexual activity is not exempt from negative consequences; we know, of course, that unprotected, careless sex can result in pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. We also know that unwanted children and critical health problems can ultimately become major roadblocks in our pursuit of educational endeavors.

But the truth of the matter is, sex is not going away. Authority figures cannot expect the preaching of abstinence-and-only-abstinence to stop college students from having sex. Preventing students from obtaining effective prophylactic devices such as condoms, birth control pills, and emergency contraception, or forcing students to jump through hoops to acquire these items, serves only to intensify the problem. While Allegheny's Winslow Health Center and the Meadville Family Planning Clinic have good intentions with regard to the provision of contraceptives and treatment of reproductive health concerns for students, their intentions are shunted by limited hours of operation and limited procedural options.

As members of the Allegheny College community with vested interests in the availability of reproductive healthcare options on campus-especially in light of current national news and the threat of losing the right to choose altogether-we are demanding that campus administrators reconsider the existing campus policies on student reproductive healthcare. We propose the following series of amendments, to go into effect for the next (2004-2005) academic year:

In making our demands, we are in no way insinuating that Allegheny College should step beyond the bounds of state and federal laws; we realize that certain forms of contraception such as RU-486 (Mifepristone) are not legal within the United States, and that emergency contraception (Plan B) is not medically safe for everyone. Our demands are simple. We're asking for an increase in the College's awareness of students' reproductive healthcare needs and an improvement in the College's response to and treatment of these issues. Sex, as we noted, isn't going away… so neither should students' rights to easily-accessible reproductive healthcare options.