H-NET BOOK REVIEW Published by H-Pol@ksuvm.ksu.edu (November 1996) Lewis L. Gould, ed., _American First Ladies: Their Lives and their Legacy_. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1996. 712 pp. 37 illustrations and index. $95.00 (cloth). Reviewed for H-POL by Gil Troy, McGill UniversityThe fledgling field of First Lady scholarship is not for the feint-hearted. For years the very notion seemed to be a contradiction in terms. Studying the ladies who served tea and purchased White House china was not the way to gain respect or secure tenure. Even in these more feminist times, when the blossoming of women's studies and of social history has made us appreciate what these premier hostesses can teach us, many recoil from studying these traitors to their gender, these women who stayed behind the scenes serving as the wives of prominent men. Lewis L. Gould, the Eugene C. Baker Centennial Professor in American History at the University of Texas at Austin, has probably done more than any other contemporary historian to legitimize the study of First Ladies. He is reputed to have taught the first course on the history of First Ladies. His lectures and his articles in forums ranging from the _American Scholar_ to _Presidential Studies Quarterly_, have defined First Ladies as powerful actors, important celebrities, and interesting symbols of American political culture.1 His monograph _Lady Bird Johnson and the Environment_ (Lawrence, KS, 1988) is a gem, a serious, hard-headed assessment of an important politician freed of the sentimentalism and the dogmatism characteristic of too many other works. Gould's collection of essays from different scholars analyzing the thirty-eight First Ladies from Martha Washington to HillaryRodham Clinton in his encyclopedic _American First Ladies: Their Lives and their Legacy_ marks the culmination of his efforts and the maturation of this field of inquiry. Studying First Ladies exacerbates what Stephen Skowronek in _The Politics Presidents Make_ (Cambridge, 1993) identifies as one of the critical problems in presidential scholarship: how to trace lines of development in a highly idiosyncratic institution. Marriages are individual and volatile, with few formulas or clear patterns emerging over time. Good marriages have followed bad marriages in the White House; strong marriages like the Trumans' have been strained in the White House; and problematic marriages like the Eisenhowers' have healed in the White House. There is no correlation between having a successful marriage and a successful presidency, especially when the definition of marital success is even murkier and more fluid than the definition of presidential success. Thus far, the most successful books about First Ladies have been individual biographies, be it Jean H. Baker's _Mary Lincoln: A Biography_ (New York, 1987), or any number of the impressive books about Eleanor Roosevelt, including Blanche Wiesen Cook's _Eleanor Roosevelt, Volume One_ (New York, 1992), which covers Mrs. Roosevelt's life until her move into the White House in 1993; Doris Kearns Goodwin's _No Ordinary Time_ (New York, 1994), which covers the relationship between President and Mrs. Roosevelt during World War II; and Allida M. Black's _Casting Her Own Shadow_ (New York, 1996), which covers Mrs. Roosevelt's liberal crusade after her husband's death. All these books, along with Gould's work on Lady Bird Johnson illuminate the individual and her times, while making a substantive contribution to our understanding of the institution of the First Lady. Books addressing the First Lady over time have been much less successful in analyzing substantive issues. The two best efforts are Carl Sferrazza Anthony's two volumes on _First Ladies: The Saga of the Presidents' Wives and Their Power_, 2 vols. (New York, 1990-1991) and Betty Boyd Caroli, _First Ladies_ (New York, 1987). While both offer vivid portraits of the president's wives, and give some sense of the institutional development, neither advances a substantive interpretation. "The reader who expects to find here a tightly argued thesis will be disappointed," Caroli confesses. "None has emerged except the unsurprising conclusion that individual First Ladies have reflected the status of American women of their time while helping shape expectations of what women can properly do" (p. xxi). In _American First Ladies_ Gould tries to achieve biographical depth and scholarly resonance by farming out the portraits of the First Ladies to various experts and providing an introduction on "The First Lady as Symbol and Institution." Gould wants to "provide the general reading public, especially students coming initially to First Ladies, with informative entries about each of these women, entries that also indicate the location of primary sources, reliable biographies where available, and topics for further research." (p. xiii) The entries range from five thousand to ten thousand words, reflecting Gould's sense of the individual's historical significance. Each essay about a First Lady, he explains, "is a self-contained unit with a chronological account of her life and an effort to assess her place in the development of the institution of the First Lady." Overall, the book "seeks to provide readers with a sense of the institutional continuity and traditions of the position of the First Lady as it has evolved over more than 200 years." (p. xiv) The result is a compelling and illuminating work. One essay after another introduces us to fascinating women whose lives were an odd mixture of great accomplishment and paralyzing passivity. Gould himself tackles three of the most influential First Ladies, Edith Bolling Wilson, a woman accused of seizing presidential power from her ailing husband; Lady Bird Johnson, a woman who succeeded in carving out her own domain while managing her demanding and dyspeptic mate; and Hillary Rodham Clinton, a woman whose great successes -- and greater failures -- epitomize the anomalous position of women in modern America. Other particularly effective portraits include Phyllis Lee Levin on the formidable New England mother, Abigail Adams; Lynn Hudson Parsons on the difficult marriage of John Quincy Adams to Louisa Adams; Jean H. Baker on the oft-misunderstood and much-maligned Mary Todd Lincoln; and Stacy A. Cordery on the poignant, and long unrequited, relationship between Theodore Roosevelt and his second wife, Edith Kermit Roosevelt. In addition to providing the expected insights into presidential biography, the growth of the presidency, the expansion of the national government, and the role of women in America, these essays yield all kinds of unexpected results. Again and again the reader is struck by the role of class tensions in the relationships between up-and-coming future presidents and their often well-bred wives. Melba Porter Hay quotes John Tyler's heartfelt confession to his first wife Letitia that he was glad he was of modest means when they became betrothed, for "If I had been wealthy, the idea of your being actuated by prudential considerations in accepting my suit, would have eternally tortured me." (p. 111) Also, the economic burdens of the presidency and of public life in general for nineteenth century politicians become clear. Many of these women did not have easy lives. In addition to absentee husbands, they suffered from alcoholic fathers, ne'er do well sons, the premature death of loved ones, especially children. Some reflections on these phenomena in the introduction, and an assessment of whether these individuals had particularly hard lives which perhaps inured them to the demands of political life, would have made this volume even richer. To call a reference text like this with 32 different contributors uneven is axiomatic, but it is a problem. Also, while Gould's credentials are impressive, and he has enlisted some premier historians including Jean Baker, most of his authors are unknowns. The variety of backgrounds his authors bring to the table, including a writer of children's books, a developer of educational software, and a host of fledgling Ph.D. students in nontenure track jobs at obscure universities -- many of whom studied, it seems, with Gould -- may reflect the vagaries of the modern job market and Gould's generous (and lamentably rare) desire to give some young people exposure. The roster also reflects the primitive state of First Lady scholarship -- it is still considered somewhat disreputable, somewhat fluffy. This excellent volume would have been even better had more heavyweights of presidential scholarship been enlisted to take a look at the wives. Asking a Fred Greenstein to write about Mrs. Eisenhower, an Alonzo Hamby to write about Harry S. Truman, a Robert Dallek to write about Mrs. Reagan or Mrs. Johnson, would have brought more conventional historical issues to the fore and would have helped compensate for most presidential biographers' neglect of the wives. Bringing in more presidential scholars may have also avoided the one truly lamentable flaw in this work, and in so many works about First Ladies. Most First Lady scholars' desire to justify their field, to save their subjects from obscurity, to prove these women's influence, leads to an unfortunate celebratory tone. It is hard to believe that a collection of essays about our presidents would be as upbeat, as positive, as apologetic as this work tends to be. At times, the assessments are more suited to a pep rally than a college seminar. The harshest criticism most of the writers offer are that, occasionally, one of these ladies reflected the limits imposed on women at the time. Until historians are ready to criticize First Ladies as freely as most contemporaries were -- and still are -- until historians stop searching for every minor example of a First Lady's power and begin appreciating the First Ladies' role in image-making, this field will not have fully arrived. Still, this authoritative, enjoyable, and most welcome work represents a great leap forward in this all too neglected field. Copyright (c) 1996 by H-Net, all rights reserved. This work may be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit is given to the author and the list. For other permission, please contact H-Net@H-Net.Msu.Edu.
Back to Women and the Election Page